Welcome to the Red Hat Security: Linux in Physical, Virtual, and Cloud (RH415) group!

[Deanna]

We are excited to launch a space dedicated to the Red Hat Training course Red Hat Security: Linux in Physical, Virtual, and Cloud!

To gain the most value from this group - click the "Join Group" button in the upper right hand corner of the group home page.

We encourage group members to collaborate in this group to discuss topics, ask questions, share best practices and tips, provide course feedback, and share their accomplishments as it relates to RH415.

Read more about Red Hat Security: Linux in Physical, Virtual, and Cloud here.

[Chetan_Tiwary_]

@TonyButt ok let me check that again for you.

[mem]

The headline at ch3 "LUKS is not recommended in the following scenarios" should not include the word "not", I guess.

[mem]

In ch3 the headline "LUKS is not recommended in the following scenarios" should not include the word "not", I guess.

[Chetan_Tiwary_]

@mem Sorry but the wording "Not" is correct and it gives you specific scenarios where you should not use LUKS because it may not satisfy the requirement :

[Joerg-RH]

Hi folks,
I'm just wondering whether I got the correct command output in my lab for guided exercise "Managing RHEL Security with Red Hat Errata". The command `dnf updateinfo list updates security --cve CVE-2023-38408` gives me 16 lines of output including RHSA for less, libcurl, etc. The command `dnf update --cve CVE-2023-38408` applies the RHSA for openssh only. Is this correct and expected or should the first command output be limited to the RHSA-2023:4412?

[JacquesW]

Hi @Joerg-RH 

Check this older topic of mine:
https://learn.redhat.com/t5/RH415-Red-Hat-Security-Linux-in/Error-in-the-command-chapter-1/m-p/45932...

Best regards,

Jacques